Current:Home > InvestCalifornia regulators propose higher rates for PG&E customers to reduce wildfire risk -EverVision Finance
California regulators propose higher rates for PG&E customers to reduce wildfire risk
View
Date:2025-04-20 09:59:13
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Power bills for about 16 million people in Northern California will likely increase after state regulators released two rate proposals for one of the nation’s largest utilities Wednesday.
The California Public Utilities Commission is finishing up its once-every-four-years review of Pacific Gas & Electric, the Oakland-based utility that provides electric and gas service to a 70,000-square-mile (181,000-square-kilometer) area in northern and central parts of the state. The commission must approve how much PG&E can charge customers and how it will spend that money.
The commission on Wednesday could not say what the increase would be for the average residential customer. But it is likely to be far less than what PG&E had initially requested — the company had asked for rate increases large enough to boost its revenue by 26%, but the two proposals the commission released would increase revenue by a maximum of 13%.
PG&E had asked for more revenue in part to pay for a plan to bury about 3,300 miles (5,300 kilometers) of power lines to help prevent wildfires. Burying powerlines is expensive and takes a long time to complete. But PG&E has argued it is the best way to essentially eliminate the risk of strong winds knocking down power lines and starting wildfires, like the 2018 Camp Fire that killed 85 people and destroyed thousands of homes.
The Utility Reform Network, which advocates on behalf of ratepayers, has argued that a faster and cheaper way to reduce wildfire risk is to insulate power lines instead of burying them.
It appears the commission agrees. Both of its proposals would approve rate increases sufficient to bury less than 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) of lines.
Still, “both proposed decisions adopt substantial and painful increases to monthly bills, far beyond the cost of inflation, which (we believe) should be a cap for bill increases,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network.
One proposal, written by administration law judges, would increase PG&E’s revenue by 13%. The other one, from John Reynolds, the PUC commissioner assigned to the case, would increase the company’s revenue by 9%. The commission is scheduled to consider them during its Nov. 2 meeting.
PG&E spokesperson Lynsey Paulo said the company is reviewing the proposals and its own proposal “continues the transformation of our energy system to further reduce wildfire risk, improve safety and climate resilience and support continued growth of clean energy.”
The issue of PG&E’s rates has been pending for more than two years.
A decision was delayed last year after the company made two changes to its initial application, first to request the burial of the 3,300 miles (5,300 kilometers) of power lines and later to increase its rate request because of inflation and taxes.
veryGood! (97)
Related
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Timothée Chalamet makes an electric Bob Dylan: 'A Complete Unknown' review
- Trump says Kari Lake will lead Voice of America. He attacked it during his first term
- Biden and Tribal Leaders Celebrate Four Years of Accomplishments on Behalf of Native Americans
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- How Hailee Steinfeld and Josh Allen Navigate Their Private Romance on Their Turf
- 'We are all angry': Syrian doctor describes bodies from prisons showing torture
- South Korea opposition leader Lee says impeaching Yoon best way to restore order
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Only about 2 in 10 Americans approve of Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter, an AP
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Australian man arrested for starting fire at Changi Airport
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Ohio Supreme Court sides with pharmacies in appeal of $650 million opioid judgment
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Donald Trump is returning to the world stage. So is his trolling
- Arizona city sues federal government over PFAS contamination at Air Force base
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
OCBC chief Helen Wong joins Ho Ching, Jenny Lee on Forbes' 100 most powerful women list
Atmospheric river and potential bomb cyclone bring chaotic winter weather to East Coast
Jim Carrey Reveals Money Inspired His Return to Acting in Candid Paycheck Confession
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
'Unimaginable situation': South Korea endures fallout from martial law effort
Morgan Wallen's Chair Throwing Case Heading to Criminal Court
Joe Burrow’s home broken into during Monday Night Football in latest pro