Current:Home > StocksGeorgia's highest court reinstates ban on abortions after 6 weeks -EverVision Finance
Georgia's highest court reinstates ban on abortions after 6 weeks
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:58:26
ATLANTA — The Georgia Supreme Court Wednesday reinstated the state's ban on abortions after roughly six weeks of pregnancy, abruptly ending access to later abortions that had resumed days earlier.
In a one-page order, the justices put a lower court ruling overturning the ban on hold while they consider an appeal. Abortion providers who had resumed performing the procedure past six weeks again had to stop.
Attorneys and advocates who pushed to overturn the ban said the abrupt halt will traumatize women who must now arrange travel to other states for an abortion or keep their pregnancies.
"It is outrageous that this extreme law is back in effect, just days after being rightfully blocked," said Alice Wang, an attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights that represented abortion providers challenging Georgia's ban. "This legal ping pong is causing chaos for medical providers trying to do their jobs and for patients who are now left frantically searching for the abortion services they need."
The state attorney general's office in a court filing said "untold numbers of unborn children" would "suffer the permanent consequences" if the state Supreme Court did not issue a stay and halt the Nov. 15 decision by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney.
McBurney ruled the state's abortion ban was invalid because when it was signed into law in 2019, U.S. Supreme Court precedent established by Roe v. Wade and another ruling allowed abortion well past six weeks.
The decision immediately prohibited enforcement of the abortion ban statewide. The state appealed and asked the Georgia Supreme Court to put the decision on hold while the appeal moved forward.
Though abortions past six weeks had resumed, some abortion providers said they were proceeding cautiously over concerns the ban could be quickly reinstated.
Georgia's ban took effect in July, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. It prohibited most abortions once a "detectable human heartbeat" was present.
Cardiac activity can be detected by ultrasound in cells within an embryo that will eventually become the heart around six weeks into a pregnancy. That means most abortions in Georgia were effectively banned at a point before many people knew they were pregnant.
The measure was passed by the state Legislature and signed into law by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp in 2019. In his ruling, McBurney said the timing — before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade — made the law immediately invalid.
Legislatures exceed their authority when they enact laws that violate a constitutional right declared by the judicial branch, he wrote.
To enact the law, the state Legislature would have to pass it again, he wrote.
The state attorney general's office in a filing with the Georgia Supreme Court blasted McBurney's reasoning as having "no basis in law, precedent, or common sense."
Plaintiffs' attorneys defended it in a reply and warned of "irreparable harm" to women if it were put on hold. They also asked the high court for 24 hours notice before issuing any stay to "avoid the potential chaos" from resuming the ban while women waited for an abortion or were in the middle of getting one.
The state Supreme Court did not conduct a hearing before issuing its order, and plaintiffs' attorneys said it denied their request for 24 hours notice.
The high court's order said seven of the nine justices agreed with the decision. It said one was disqualified and another did not participate.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Euphora Star Sydney Sweeney Says This Moisturizer “Is Like Putting a Cloud on Your Face”
- Euphora Star Sydney Sweeney Says This Moisturizer “Is Like Putting a Cloud on Your Face”
- NPR quits Twitter after being falsely labeled as 'state-affiliated media'
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Christy Carlson Romano Reacts to Chrissy Teigen and John Legend’s Even Stevens-Approved Baby Name
- NPR quits Twitter after being falsely labeled as 'state-affiliated media'
- Blake Lively Gives a Nod to Baby No. 4 While Announcing New Business Venture
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Earthjustice Is Suing EPA Over Coal Ash Dumps, Which Leak Toxins Into Groundwater
Ranking
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Al Jaffee, longtime 'Mad Magazine' cartoonist, dies at 102
- Child's body confirmed by family as Mattie Sheils, who had been swept away in a Philadelphia river
- Rural Electric Co-ops in Alabama Remain Way Behind the Solar Curve
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Glee’s Kevin McHale Recalls Jenna Ushkowitz and Naya Rivera Confronting Him Over Steroid Use
- In the Latest Rights of Nature Case, a Tribe Is Suing Seattle on Behalf of Salmon in the Skagit River
- In historic move, Biden nominates Adm. Lisa Franchetti as first woman to lead Navy
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Businesses face more and more pressure from investors to act on climate change
How Climate and the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline Undergirds the Ukraine-Russia Standoff
Two mysterious bond market indicators
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Inspired by King’s Words, Experts Say the Fight for Climate Justice Anywhere is a Fight for Climate Justice Everywhere
Why can't Twitter and TikTok be easily replaced? Something called 'network effects'
Nature’s Say: How Voices from Hawai’i Are Reframing the Climate Conversation